Tories under fire from coalition of developers

8/01/10 11:46 am By Richard Heap

Conservative Party planning policies have come under fire from four leading UK property companies this week even before the party has published its long-awaited planning policy paper.

A coalition called Building Futures – comprising private developers Land Securities, Segro, Countryside Properties and Places for People – said Tory plans for “localism” would encourage nimbyism and put development at risk. However, the group said it would support some Conservative policies, such as the introduction of development incentives for local authorities.

Building Futures commissioned ComRes to look at the Conservative plans and plans to meet shadow planning minister Bob Neill to present its findings. For example, it found that half of councillors thought government housing targets were too high.

John Oldham, chief town planner at Countryside Properties, said: “If the industry is to encourage economic recovery, we have to lift the burden of the planning programme.”

The Conservatives also came under fire from the private sector on Tuesday when property consultant King Sturge said it would be difficult for the party to be pro-development if it won the next general election because its local support was based on opposing schemes. It made the prediction during an event looking at what it expected to happen in 2010.

Don't miss the Public Property Summit - 1-2 November 2010

Want news like this straight to your inbox? Sign up here for alerts.






One Comment »

  • Alastair Sheehan said:

    The Tory policy on planning will be an unmitigated disaster. So much money has been thrown at getting the current planning system right, that it is actually beginning to work. Granted, the RDA’s could take on more actual work, however the issues of localism will grind housebuilding to a halt.

    The pressure internally at local level will eventually lead to financial incentives from developers. You thought the recently exposed corruption in Westminster was bad – it is going to be nothing compared to the scandals that this policy could create.

Leave your response!